3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re M.M..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re M.M. Anchor | green | “refrains from reading something into the statute that is not readily found in its words.” | 4 |
| 2 | Stewart Title of the Midwest, Inc. v. Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc. | green | “is that the intent of the legislature governs if that intent can be ascertained.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Bee | green | “so as to make them consistent, harmonious, and sensible.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.