3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mulford v. Altria Group, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mulford v. Altria Group, Inc. Anchor | green | “to state a claim under the upa, a plaintiff must show that: (1) defendant made an oral or written statement that was either false or misleading; (2) the false or misleading representation was knowingly made in connection with the sale of goods or services; (3) the conduct compla…” | 4 |
| 2 | Smoot v. Physicians Life Insurance | green | “thus, new mexico law strongly encourages open and transparent dealings in the insurance context, particularly with regard to material information.” | 3 |
| 3 | Mulford v. Altria Group, Inc. | green | “(1) defendant made an oral or written statement that was either false or misleading; (2) the false or misleading representation was knowingly made in connection with the sale of goods or services; (3) the conduct complained of occurred in the regular course of defendant's busine…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.