2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. United States Department of Justice.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. United States Department of Justice Anchor | green | “the agency may carry that burden by submitting affidavits that 'describe the justifications for nondisclosure with reasonably specific detail, demonstrate that the information withheld logically falls within the claimed exemption, and are not controverted by either contrary evid…” | 6 |
| 2 | Murphy v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys | green | “describe the justifications for nondisclosure with reasonably specific detail' and 'demonstrate that the information withheld logically falls within the claimed exemption.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.