2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Holt v. Hobbs.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holt v. Hobbs Anchor | green | “if a less restrictive means is available for the government to achieve its goals, the government must use it.” | 7 |
| 2 | Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. | green | “it is important to confirm that a premise of the court's opinion is its assumption that the hhs regulation here at issue furthers a legitimate and compelling interest in the health of female employees.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.