2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rand Resources, LLC v. City of Carson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rand Resources, LLC v. City of Carson Anchor | green | “the legislature enacted section 425.16 in response to 'a disturbing increase in lawsuits brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for the redress of grievances.” | 5 |
| 2 | Cross v. Cooper | green | “has been described as a summary-judgment-like procedure. the court determines whether '"the plaintiff has stated a legally sufficient claim and made a prima facie factual showing sufficient to sustain a favorable judgment.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.