4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 89 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko Anchor | green | “so long as the plaintiff had an avenue for some redress, bedrock principles of separation of powers foreclosed judicial imposition of a new substantive liability.” | 39 |
| 2 | Scott Callahan v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons | green | “what started out as a presumption in favor of implied rights of action has become a firm presumption against them.” | 21 |
| 3 | Scott Callahan v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons | green | “alternative processes, for bivens purposes, do not have to be creations of congress.” | 15 |
| 4 | Scott Callahan v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons | green | “prison-based claims also present a risk of interference with prison administration.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.