2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lioce v. Cohen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lioce v. Cohen Anchor | green | “n attorney's statements of personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the credibility of a witness, or the culpability of a litigant is. . . improper in civil cases and may amount to prejudicial misconduct necessitating a new trial.” | 4 |
| 2 | Maduike v. Agency Rent-A-Car | green | “omparative negligence reductions do not apply when the claim is based on strict liability.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.