3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wilson Ex Rel. Fobb v. Bruks-Klockner, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilson Ex Rel. Fobb v. Bruks-Klockner, Inc. Anchor | green | “when a plaintiff seeks to add a non-diverse defendant whose joinder would defeat federal jurisdiction, the district court must consider the hensgens factors.” | 5 |
| 2 | Agyei v. Endurance Power Products, Inc. | green | “in analyzing the first hensgens factor, courts take into account considerations such as whether the plaintiff knew or should have known the identity of the nondiverse defendant when the state court suit was filed, whether the plaintiff states a valid claim against the nondiverse…” | 2 |
| 3 | Agyei v. Endurance Power Products, Inc. | green | “whether the plaintiff knew or should have known the identity of the nondiverse defendant when the state court suit was filed, whether the plaintiff states a valid claim against the nondiverse defendant, and the timing of the amendment.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.