3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. Roberge.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. Roberge Anchor | green | “repugnant to the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.” | 4 |
| 2 | Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. Roberge | green | “repugnant to the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment” | 3 |
| 3 | Eubank v. City of Richmond | green | “not only the extent of use but the kind of use which another set of owners may make of their property,” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.