3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James v. United States Anchor | green | “the jury can find expert testimony adequately rebutted by the observations of laymen” | 3 |
| 2 | Dudley v. Layman | green | “the jury can find expert testimony adequately rebutted by the observations of laymen” | 3 |
| 3 | Emery v. United States | green | “the jury can find expert testimony adequately rebutted by the observations of laymen” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.