2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Will v. Hallock.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Will v. Hallock Anchor | green | “we have not mentioned applying the collateral order doctrine recently without emphasizing its modest scope.” | 6 |
| 2 | People of State of Illinois v. Peters | green | “the head and tail of the same coin.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.