3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Utah v. Evans.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Utah v. Evans Anchor | green | “a significant increase in the likelihood that the plaintiff would obtain relief that directly redresses the injury suffered” | 4 |
| 2 | Reed v. State | green | “contained biological material suitable for dna testing.” | 3 |
| 3 | Utah v. Evans | green | “practical consequence of that change would amount to a significant increase in the likelihood that the plaintiff would obtain relief that directly redresses the injury suffered.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.