2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L. Anchor | green | “we believe the stream of commerce theory as set forth by justice brennan is the correct analysis to apply to the case at hand.” | 4 |
| 2 | Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. | green | “the question cannot be answered by applying a mechanical formula or rule of thumb but by ascertaining what is fair and reasonable the circumstances.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.