3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brown v. Automotive Components Holdings, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown v. Automotive Components Holdings, LLC Anchor | green | “require the employee to substitute accrued paid leave for unpaid fmla leave.” | 3 |
| 2 | Fritz v. Phillips Service Industries, Inc. | green | “the absence of any certification that plaintiff would require leave beyond the initial eight-week recovery period is not equivalent to an explicit certification that plain- tiff did not require any absence from work due to his condi- tion.” | 3 |
| 3 | Noemi Valdivia v. Township High School District | green | “adequacy of no- tice is a 'fact-rich question' that is 'perhaps best resolved by the trier of fact, particularly, where ... the employer and em- ployee dispute the quantity and nature of communications re- garding the employee's illness.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.