2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Washington Post Company v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Washington Post Company v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Anchor | green | “appropriate only in circumstances where 'the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 5 |
| 2 | Aguirre v. Securities & Exchange Commission | green | “correspondence does not become personal solely because it identifies government employees.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.