8 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 88 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Delk v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Delk v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. Anchor | green | “admits the truth of all material facts that are properly pleaded, facts which are impliedly alleged, and facts which may be fairly and justly inferred from the alleged facts.” | 27 |
| 2 | Fox v. Custis | green | “a demurrer does not admit the correctness of the pleader's conclusions of law.” | 21 |
| 3 | P. M. Palumbo, Jr., M.D., Inc. v. Bennett | green | “all fair inferences deducible therefrom.” | 12 |
| 4 | Fox v. Custis | green | “does not admit the correctness of the pleader's conclusions of law.” | 8 |
| 5 | Luckett v. Jennings | green | “trial court is required to consider as true all material facts that are properly pleaded, facts which are impliedly alleged, and facts which may be fairly and justly inferred from the facts alleged.” | 6 |
| 6 | MARK FIVE CONST. v. Castle Contractors | green | “a demurrer will be sustained when the pleading it challenges lacks 'sufficient definiteness to enable the court to find the existence of a legal basis for its judgment'.” | 5 |
| 7 | Luckett v. Jennings | green | “in reviewing the sufficiency of a motion for judgment on demurrer, the trial court is required to consider as true all material facts that are properly pleaded, facts which are impliedly alleged, and facts which may be fairly and justly inferred from the facts alleged.” | 5 |
| 8 | Fox v. Custis | green | “admit the correctness of the pleader's conclusions of law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.