3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smp Sales Management, Inc. v. Fleet Credit Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smp Sales Management, Inc. v. Fleet Credit Corporation Anchor | green | “quasi-contractual remedies may not supplant a contract between the parties.” | 3 |
| 2 | Baker v. MacLay Properties Co. | green | “resort to equity only in cases of unjust enrichment for which there is no justification in law or contract.” | 3 |
| 3 | Brown v. Coleman Investments, Inc. | green | “(1) an enrichment, (2) an impoverishment, (3) a connection between the enrichment and the resulting impoverishment, (4) an absence of 'justification' or 'cause' for the enrichment and impoverishment, and (5) no other remedy at law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.