2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Spruce v. Sargent.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spruce v. Sargent Anchor | green | “should-have-known' standard, is not sufficient to support a finding of deliberate indifference.” | 5 |
| 2 | Patchette v. Nix | green | “whether conditions at a specific prison are unconstitutional necessitates a factual inquiry about the specific conditions at that facility.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.