3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from W.G. B.G., Individually and as Parents of R.G., a Minor v. Board of Trustees of Target Range School District No. 23, Missoula, Montana.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | W.G. B.G., Individually and as Parents of R.G., a Minor v. Board of Trustees of Target Range School District No. 23, Missoula, Montana Anchor | green | “the procedural defects in the development of the iep resulted in denying the student a fape.” | 3 |
| 2 | Poolaw v. Bishop | green | “a district court's determination that a student is incapable of deriving educational benefits unless placed in a self contained program is reviewed for clear error.” | 3 |
| 3 | Charlie F., by His Parents and Next Friends Neil and Bonnie F. v. Board of Education of Skokie School District 68 | green | “at least in principle relief is available under the idea” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.