3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Jeffrey L. Foster and Karla Foster.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Jeffrey L. Foster and Karla Foster Anchor | green | “if the district court promptly sustains a timely objection to a question concerning post- arrest silence, instructs the jury to disregard the question, and gives a curative jury instruction.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Rodrigo Pino-Noriega | green | “whether an inference of guilt from silence was stressed to the jury” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Lucio Pina-Jaime, AKA Lucio Pina Jaime AKA Lucio Jaime Pina | green | “a deported alien violates 8 u.s.c. 1326 (a)(2) if he 'enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in' the united states unless 'the attorney general has expressly consented to such alien's reapplying for admission.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.