2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pat Roger v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pat Roger v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. Anchor | green | “the causality requirement calls for more than a sequential connection.” | 5 |
| 2 | Hinthorn v. Roland's of Bloomington, Inc. | green | “the overriding purpose of the iwca is to protect injured employees by ensuring the availability of medical treatment, by shifting the financial burden of such treatment to the employer.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.