2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Olefins Trading, Inc. v. Han Yang Chem Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Olefins Trading, Inc. v. Han Yang Chem Corporation Anchor | green | “where a miscarriage of justice would result if the verdict were to stand.” | 6 |
| 2 | Sandrow v. United States | green | “the verdict is contrary to the great weight of the evidence or errors at trial produce a result inconsistent with substantial justice.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.