3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Brian NEILL, Defendant-Appellant.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Brian NEILL, Defendant-Appellant Anchor | green | “review the evidence presented against the defendant in the light most favorable to the government to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Alejandro Pacheco-Medina | green | “deprived of his liberty and prevented from going at large within the united states.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Pedro Ruiz-Lopez | green | “the restraint may take the form of surveillance, unbeknownst to the alien.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.