4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Kim Darby Saenz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Kim Darby Saenz Anchor | green | “the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Robert C. Enriquez | green | “an extraordinary sentence reduction” | 2 |
| 3 | United States v. Robert C. Enriquez | green | “as a practical matter, mrs. enriquez actually did receive an extraordinary sentence reduction of 50 per cent., as opposed to the 20 per cent, expected.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.