2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pasqual Antonio-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pasqual Antonio-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Anchor | green | “as a general rule, ignorance of the law is no excuse.” | 6 |
| 2 | Johan Sumolang v. Eric H. Holder Jr. | green | “as a general rule, ignorance of the law is no excuse.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.