2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Custis v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Custis v. United States Anchor | green | “apply for reopening of any federal sentence enhanced by the state sentences.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Robert James Gadsen | green | “succeeds in a future collateral proceeding in overturning his state conviction, federal law enables him then to seek review of any federal sentence that was enhanced due to his state conviction.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.