3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bank of China, New York Branch v. Nbm LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bank of China, New York Branch v. Nbm LLC Anchor | green | “the purpose of rule 701(c) is 'to eliminate the risk that the reliability requirements set forth in rule 702 will be evaded through the simple expedient of proffering an expert in lay witness clothing.” | 3 |
| 2 | Bank of China, New York Branch v. Nbm LLC | green | “to eliminate the risk that the reliability requirements set forth in rule 702 will be evaded through the simple expedient of proffering an expert in lay witness clothing.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Cuti | green | “lay opinion under rule 701 must be limited to opinions that 'result from a process of reasoning familiar in everyday life.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.