2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brelsford v. Stoll.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brelsford v. Stoll Anchor | green | “alleged contract was illegal and void from its inception as contravening the provisions of the gaming statutes of illinois and against public policy and was therefore unenforceable” | 4 |
| 2 | Schneider v. Turner | green | “othing is more clearly and firmly established by the common law, than that all gambling contracts are void” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.