2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re DQ.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re DQ Anchor | green | “prognostic evidence, including reports and opinions of the professionals involved, that forms the basis for a reasonable prediction as to future behavior must be evaluated in determining if a child's deprivation is likely to continue.” | 5 |
| 2 | In the Matter of Adoption of Srf | green | “clear and convincing evidence means evidence that leads to a firm belief or conviction the allegations are true.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.