3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 87 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Caldwell v. Hill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caldwell v. Hill Anchor | green | “we are not permitted to substitute our judgment for that of the trial court.” | 47 |
| 2 | Caldwell v. Hill | green | “as long as reasonable minds could disagree about its correctness.” | 28 |
| 3 | White v. Vanderbilt University | green | “(1) whether the factual basis for the decision is supported by the evidence, (2) whether the trial court identified and applied the applicable legal principles, and (3) whether the trial court's decision is within the range of acceptable alternatives.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.