3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Koltay v. Koltay.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Koltay v. Koltay Anchor | green | “a different interpretation would be wholly inconsistent with the independence that the word 'emancipation' connotes.” | 3 |
| 2 | Streb v. Streb | green | “the presumption of emancipation may be overcome by evidence that an adult child is incapable of supporting himself or herself by reason of a physical or mental disability” | 3 |
| 3 | Ex Parte Brewington | green | “the presumption of emancipation may be overcome by evidence that an adult child is incapable of supporting himself or herself by reason of a physical or mental disability” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.