2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from JR LOGGING v. Halford.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JR LOGGING v. Halford Anchor | green | “a finding is clearly erroneous when, although there is some slight evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made by the commission in its findings of fact and in its application of th…” | 5 |
| 2 | Metal Trims Industries, Inc. v. Stovall | green | “where no evidence or only a scintilla of evidence supports a workers' compensation commission decision, this court does not hesitate to reverse.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.