2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jeffrey v. Hays Plumbing & Heating.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeffrey v. Hays Plumbing & Heating Anchor | green | “we should not attribute to the legislature an undue precision in drafting and thereby frustrate legislative intent when we construe a statute.” | 5 |
| 2 | Eldridge v. Circle K Corp. | green | “our task is not to apply language literally when it would lead to counterproductive, inconsistent, and absurd results; we must harmonize the statutory language to achieve the overall legislative purpose.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.