2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Worker's Compensation Claim of Dale v. S & S Builders, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Worker's Compensation Claim of Dale v. S & S Builders, LLC Anchor | green | “no special deference to the district court's decision,” | 5 |
| 2 | Parodi v. Wyoming Department of Transportation | green | “absent evidentiary dispute, the standard of review for contested case hearings is simply stated as whether an agency's conclusions are in accordance with the law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.