2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service Anchor | green | “the standard of review is highly deferential; the agency's decision is entitled to a presumption of regularity, and the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency.” | 6 |
| 2 | Wildearth Guardians v. Heather Provencio | green | “strictly interpret the procedural requirements in nepa to the fullest extent possible consistent with the policies embodied in nepa. grudging, pro forma compliance will not do.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.