2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation Anchor | green | “the second circuit has taken a liberal view of the qualification requirements of rule 702, at least to the extent that a lack of formal training does not necessarily disqualify an expert from testifying if he or she has equivalent relevant practical experience.” | 5 |
| 2 | Zerega Avenue Realty Corp. v. Hornbeck Offshore Transportation, LLC | green | “the decision to admit expert testimony is left to the broad discretion of the trial judge and will be overturned only when manifestly erroneous.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.