3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 87 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gail Martin v. Andrew M. Saul.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gail Martin v. Andrew M. Saul Anchor | green | “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 58 |
| 2 | Loveless v. Colvin | green | “identify medical evidence that would justify further restrictions” | 15 |
| 3 | Jennifer Karr v. Andrew Saul | green | “even if reasonable minds could differ on the weight the alj gave to the medical evidence, we will not substitute our judgment for that of the alj's by reweighing the evidence.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.