2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hall v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hall v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “subjecting an accused to the hazards of vexatious, multiple prosecutions.” | 6 |
| 2 | Epps v. Commonwealth | green | “it amounts to such a defense in purpose and desired effect.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.