3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re L.T.R..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re L.T.R. Anchor | green | “are conclusive on appeal when supported by any competent evidence, even if the evidence could sustain contrary findings.” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re LTR | green | “are conclusive on appeal when supported by any competent evidence, even if the evidence could sustain contrary findings.” | 3 |
| 3 | In re J.V. | green | “review of a permanency planning order is limited to whether there is competent evidence in the record to support the findings and whether the findings support the conclusions of law.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.