3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Andrews v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrews v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. Anchor | green | “make the best prediction of what the state court would do if confronted with the question” | 3 |
| 2 | Tina Vance v. Amazon.com, Inc. | green | “anticipate how the relevant state's highest court would rule in the case” | 3 |
| 3 | Tina Vance v. Amazon.com, Inc. | green | “anticipate how the relevant state's highest court would rule in the case and are bound by controlling decisions of that court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.