2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Lj.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Lj Anchor | green | “when the language of a statute is plain and susceptible to only one natural and reasonable construction, courts must construe the statute accordingly.” | 5 |
| 2 | Reeves v. UPSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | green | “when we consider the meaning of a statute, we always must presume that the general assembly means what it says and says what it means, and an unambiguous statute must be afforded its plain meaning.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.