3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 86 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Johnson v. De Grandy.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson v. De Grandy Anchor | green | “a party losing in state court is barred from seeking what in substance would be appellate review of the state judgment in a united states district court, based on the losing party's claim that the state judgment itself violates the loser's federal rights.” | 57 |
| 2 | Johnson v. De Grandy | green | “a party losing in state court ... from seeking what in substance would be appellate review of the state judgment in a united states district court, based on the losing party's claim that the state judgment itself violates the loser's federal rights.” | 15 |
| 3 | Speelman v. United States | green | “the court need not accept factual inferences drawn by plaintiffs if those inferences are not supported by facts alleged in the complaint, nor must the court accept plaintiff's legal conclusions.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.