2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re the Guardianship of J.N.H..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re the Guardianship of J.N.H. Anchor | green | “appellate review of a trial court's decision to terminate parental rights is limited.” | 6 |
| 2 | New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. N.C.M. and T.E. and J.C. in the Matter of the Guardianship of T.M., M.L.W., and M.A.J.M. | green | “particular deference is afforded to family court fact- finding because of the family courts' special jurisdiction and expertise in family matters.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.