8 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 86 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fastpath, Inc. v. Arbela Technologies Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fastpath, Inc. v. Arbela Technologies Corp. Anchor | green | “when personal jurisdiction is challenged by a defendant, the plaintiff bears the burden to show that jurisdiction exists.” | 25 |
| 2 | Fastpath, Inc. v. Arbela Technologies Corp. | green | “to successfully survive a motion to dismiss challenging personal jurisdiction, a plaintiff must make a prima facie showing of personal jurisdiction over the challenging defendant.” | 14 |
| 3 | Creative Calling Solutions, Inc. v. LF Beauty Ltd. | green | “if the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, is sufficient to support a conclusion that the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the defendant is proper.” | 9 |
| 4 | Johnson v. Arden | green | “absent additional contacts, mere effects in the forum state are insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction.” | 8 |
| 5 | Digi-Tel Holdings, Inc. v. Proteq Telecommunications (Pte), Ltd., Brustuen International, Inc., Intervenor | green | “cannot make up for the absence of minimum contacts.” | 8 |
| 6 | Fastpath, Inc. v. Arbela Technologies Corp. | green | “the plaintiff bears the burden to show that jurisdiction exists.” | 8 |
| 7 | Mary E. Bonner Johnson v. Richard W. Woodcock | green | “coextensive with constitutional limits,” | 7 |
| 8 | Creative Calling Solutions, Inc. v. LF Beauty Ltd. | green | “but where, as here, the parties submit affidavits to bolster their positions on the motion, and the district court relies on the evidence, the motion is in substance one for summary judgment.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.