Topic: an ultimatum on one side, met with steadfast defiance on th… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #375

5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 71 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chi. Reg'l Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Celtic Floor Covering, Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Chi. Reg'l Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Celtic Floor Covering, Inc. Anchor
illinoised · 2018
green “an ultimatum on one side, met with steadfast defiance on the other, is not a good faith discussion.” 34
2 Chicago Observer, Inc. v. City of Chicago
ca7 · 1991
green “litigation is costly not only for the litigants but also for parties in other cases waiting in the queue for judicial attention.” 13
3 United States v. Bullion, James D.
ca7 · 2006
green “the striking of a balance of uncertainties can rarely be deemed unreasonable....” 13
4 Mejia v. Cook County, Ill.
ca7 · 2011
green “it is possible for two judges, confronted with the identical record, to come to opposite conclusions and for the appellate court to affirm both.” 8
5 Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Hytera Commc'ns Corp.
illinoised · 2019
green “while they 'conferred telephonically, all this consisted of was asking if it still opposed forensic inspection and saying it did.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check