3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bartosh v. Gulf Health Care Center-Galveston.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bartosh v. Gulf Health Care Center-Galveston Anchor | green | “to establish harm (i.e., that the error was reasonably calculated to cause and probably did cause rendition of an improper judgment), the appellant must demonstrate that the excluded evidence was both controlling on a material issue and not cumulative of other evidence.” | 3 |
| 2 | J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Ex Rel. Bank One, N.A. v. Texas Contract Carpet, Inc. | green | “the creation of a new common-law duty is a task better suited for the supreme court, not intermediate appellate courts.” | 3 |
| 3 | Black + Vernooy Architects v. Smith | green | “the creation of a new common-law duty is a task better suited for the supreme court, not intermediate appellate courts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.