2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Peterson v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peterson v. State Anchor | green | “whether the jury lists reasonably reflect a cross-section of the population.” | 5 |
| 2 | Rhone v. State | green | “the jury laws of this state are directory and the selection of the jury in an irregular manner does not render it illegal.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.