2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP) Anchor | green | “to deny standing to persons who are in fact injured simply because many others are also injured, would mean that the most injurious and widespread government actions could be questioned by nobody.” | 3 |
| 2 | Federal Election Commission v. Akins | green | “often the fact that an interest is abstract and the fact that it is widely shared go hand in hand. but their association is not invariable, and where a harm is concrete, though widely shared, the court has found 'injury in fact.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.