6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 86 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cuddington v. United Health Services, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cuddington v. United Health Services, Inc. Anchor | green | “in reviewing a motion brought under mcr 2.116(c)(10), we review the evidence submitted by the parties in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party to determine whether there is a genuine issue regarding any material fact.” | 36 |
| 2 | Cuddington v. United Health Services, Inc. | green | “we review de novo a trial court's decision on a motion for summary disposition to determine whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 16 |
| 3 | Innovative Adult Foster Care, Inc v. Ragin | green | “our review is limited to the evidence that had been presented to the circuit court at the time the motion was decided.” | 12 |
| 4 | Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Auto-Owners Insurance | green | “we review de novo a trial court's decision on a motion for summary disposition, reviewing the record in the same manner as must the trial court to determine whether the movant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 12 |
| 5 | Bennett v. Detroit Police Chief | green | “in reviewing a motion brought under mcr 2.116(c)(10), we review the evidence submitted by the parties in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party to determine whether there is a genuine issue regarding any material fact.” | 7 |
| 6 | Dobbelaere v. Auto-Owners Insurance | green | “to the extent this matter presents questions concerning the proper interpretation of contractual or statutory language, our review is also de novo.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.