3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from PERS v. Howard.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PERS v. Howard Anchor | green | “substantial evidence' has been defined by this court as 'such relevant evidence as reasonable minds might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 3 |
| 2 | Kristi Dearman v. Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi | green | “obligated to afford the agency's determinations of credibility in the fact-finding process substantial deference.” | 3 |
| 3 | Knight v. Public Employees' Retirement System | green | “a rebuttable presumption exists in favor of pers's decision, and the claimant has the burden of proving the contrary.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.