Topic: change the contract merely because we or one of the parties… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #37629

3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Natural Gas Clearinghouse v. Midgard Energy Co..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Natural Gas Clearinghouse v. Midgard Energy Co. Anchor
texapp · 2003
green “change the contract merely because we or one of the parties comes to dislike its provisions or thinks that something else is needed” 3
2 SAVA Gumarska in Kemijska Industria D.D. v. Advanced Polymer Sciences, Inc.
texapp · 2004
green “may remand the attorney's fee award for reconsideration” 3
3 Michael v. Dyke
texapp · 2001
green “with respect to an accounting, lillis reserved the right to amend his pleadings to state the actual amount of money due and accruing to him from improper deduction of compression costs and for any improper accounting of proceeds from the sale of gas sold to kachina, and received…” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check